List Archives

This forum is an archive of all posts to our mailing list over the past few years. The forum is set read only therefore to contribute you will need to join our list community. See more info about this here.

When subscribed to the list you should use your standard email client to send your posts to ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org.

List Archives

Unanswered Active Topics

Forums Search

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives

Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 1000 rID Gap Between rIDAllocationPool and rIDPreviousAllocationPool

Prev Next

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author

Messages

samhigens

Posts:50

04/30/2012 6:57 AM
Thank for the info Slav. I was wondering, in such case where role seizer happened due to Metadata cleanup, how it is decided or would be decided which existing DC the role that the removed DC had, would go to. With Regards..... Sumanto Chakraborty > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:08:19 +1000 > From: sl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: activedir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] 1000 rID Gap Between rIDAllocationPool and rIDPreviousAllocationPool > > > > Metadata cleanup implicitly includes seizing FSMO roles. Apparently the > new RID master doesn't become functional immediately. I think the delay > is due to the initsync. Alex - thanks for posting this. > > regards > > Slav > > On 28/04/2012 2:44 PM, Alex Wijoyo wrote: > > Dear All, > > Here are the chronological order of my problem: > > 1. Create new user in AD and found this error message: > > Windows cannot create the object ... because: The directory service > > has exhausted the pool of relative identifiers. > > 2. Doing dcdiag /v found out that there are two non existent server > > causing failed replication. > > 3. Doing metadata clean up as kb 216498 told. > > 4. Doing dcdiag /v and no more replication problem. > > 5. Create new user in AD and return the same error message. > > 6. Scratch my head and post a question to activedir :-D > > 7. In desperate create new user in AD and success. > > Hope this help. Thank you. > > > > Regards, > > > > Alex Wijoyo. > > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Glen Thompson (MF IT) > > <Glen.Thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> However in this case I don't think in this he siezed the FSMO role - it looks like there were two other DCs that have been forcefully removed from the domain hence the gap was 1000. > > > > List info: http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Forums >ActiveDir Mail List Archive >List Archives > RE: [ActiveDir] 1000 rID Gap Between rIDAllocationPool and rIDPreviousAllocationPool

ActiveForums 3.7

Syndicate

Friends

List Archives

List Archives

Friends

Members

Articles

Related Links

Ads